Should Guantanamo Cases Involve Capital Punishment?

Col. Lawrence J. Morris and other military prosecutors decided today to seek the death penalty for six Guantanamo Bay detainees accused of carrying-out the September 11th attacks.  The WSJ Law Blog writes that in 2001 Morris favored a high-profile public trial for these suspects before the administration decided to interrogate them in secret.  Seven years later, the notion of a public trial for these detainees raises new questions that would not have presented themselves at the time of their capture:

(1). Given the Supreme Court’s 2006 rebuke of the Guantanamo war-crimes system in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, will the process be logistically prepared to try a capital case and will it afford the defendants the level of constitutional rights required by that decision?  I found across this quote while researching this issue and found it very apropos:

“We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow. To pass these defendants a poisoned chalice is to put it to our own lips as well. We must summon such detachment and intellectual integrity to our task that this Trial will commend itself to posterity as fulfilling humanity’s aspirations to do justice.”  Opening Statement of Justice Robert Jackson, The United States of America, The French Republic, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The Union of Soviet Socialist Republic v. Hermann Wilhelm Göring, et. al., (November 21, 1945).

(2). Given that the evidence against these suspects is shrouded in secrecy, how should the uninformed public assess whether or not justice was served by these tribunals?  Should citizens automatically assume that a capital conviction is a victory against international terrorism?


2 Responses to Should Guantanamo Cases Involve Capital Punishment?

  1. nobamakoolaid says:

    Forget the legal ramifications. How do we as a nation possibly gain anything by executing these men verses having them serve the rest of their lives in prison? President Bush said way back in 2000 during one of his debates with Gore that deterrence is the only reason for capital punishment. Does anyone honestly believe that executing these men will serve as a scintilla of deterrence to other extremist who are still out there? Could the reaction be anything but negative throughout the Arab world? Why do we continue to go out of our way to present ourselves as such total jackasses to the rest of the world? Oh yeah, I remember. Can’t wait for November.

  2. laurabethnielsen says:

    I am aginst the death penalty in all circumstances. But, I have other concerns – when did the pentagon become a court? Why has it taken 6.5 years for our government to figure out that this was a crime? Why aren’t we helping to establish the legitimacy of the ICJ by asking them to press charges? One reason: no death penalty there.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: